Simulated shake panel



FIG. 1 is a top plan view of a simulated shake panel.

FIG. 2 is a fragmentary and enlarged front elevation view of a simulatedshake panel of FIG. 1.

FIG. 3 is a bottom plan view of a simulated shake panel of FIG. 1.

FIG. 4 is a fragmentary and enlarged bottom plan view a simulated shakepanel of FIG. 1.

FIG. 5 is a front elevation view of a simulated shake panel of FIG. 1.

FIG. 6 is a fragmentary and enlarged front elevation view of of asimulated shake panel of FIG. 1.

FIG. 7 is a rear elevation view of a simulated shake panel of FIG. 1.

FIG. 8 is a fragmentary and enlarged rear elevation view of a simulatedshake panel of FIG. 1.

FIG. 9 is a right end elevation view of a simulated shake panel of FIG.1.

FIG. 10 is a left end elevation view of a simulated shake panel of FIG.1.

FIG. 11 is a fragmentary and enlarged right end perspective view of asimulated shake panel of FIG. 1; and,

FIG. 12 is a fragmentary and enlarged left end perspective view of asimulated shake panel of FIG. 1.

The broken lines showing a wood-like texture represents environmentalstructure which form no part of the claimed design.

The broken lines showing a boundary at the cut portion of thefragmentary views of FIGS. 2, 4, 6, 8, 11 and 12 are not intended toform part of the claimed design. A boundary at such broken lines doesnot exist in reality in the article embodying the design. It will beunderstood that the claimed design extends to the boundary at the brokenlines but does not include such boundary.

CLAIM I claim the ornamental design for a simulated shake panel, asshown and described.